Why MatterReady
Intake tools collect information. MatterReady qualifies it.
The problem with intake forms
Most law firms already have some form of intake. A contact form on the website. A CRM. A PDF that gets emailed around. The problem isn't collecting information—it's that the information arrives incomplete, inconsistent, and unqualified.
Staff spend hours chasing missing details. Attorneys review matters that aren't ready. Conflicts surface after time has been invested. Data gets re-entered manually, introducing errors along the way.
How MatterReady is different
Generic intake forms
- Collect freeform text
- No validation or completeness checks
- Same form for every matter type
- No conflict awareness
- Manual data entry into your systems
MatterReady
- Structured, normalized data
- Completeness scoring built in
- Adaptive forms by practice area
- Early conflict signals
- Clean handoff to your systems
What matters to firms like yours
Structured data
Information arrives in consistent formats. Names are normalized. Dates are validated. Your team doesn't interpret freeform text.
Readiness scoring
Every intake is scored for completeness. Core, Enhanced, or Comprehensive. Attorneys know what's ready without reviewing every file.
Consistency
Every matter goes through the same qualification process. No variation based on who handles intake or how busy the office is.
For firms that care about getting it right
MatterReady is built for firms that want intake to be a reliable process, not a source of surprises.
- "Why did we miss that conflict?"
- "Why wasn't this information collected upfront?"
- "Why are we spending attorney time on incomplete matters?"
- "Why does every new matter require data entry?"
If these questions sound familiar, MatterReady may be worth a conversation.